I have responded to your statements on my talk page Xeex (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 07:49, 26 May 2010 (UTC).
Responded to your comments.[User:Xeex|Xeex]] (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 12:58, 26 May 2010 (UTC).[reply]
I cant find any information saying Turkish passport holders can get a visa for the counties above on arrival.In the country list, Burundi requires a visa but the map shows as visa free.Can you please double check the information is you provide is correct.Getting a visa at the airport for Cape Verde is so easy.We could put as visa on arrival as there is no Cape Verde diplomatic representative in Turkey.Many Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajdamania2 (talk • contribs) 06:35, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ozguroot, yanitin icin cok tesekurler gecikme icinde cok ozur dilerim. Eger gelinen ulkede bir Cape Verde temsilciligi yoksa vize havaalaninda cok kolaylikla alinabiliyor. Avrupada sadece bir kac ulkdede temsilicilik var. ya da tur operatorleri senin bilgini havaalina aktariyor bu sekilde vize aliyorsun. Tanzanya yuksek komiserligini aradim , nedenini bilmiyorum ama havalaninda vize alamayacagimi soyledi. Vanuatu, basvuru postayla yapliyor Basvuru formunuz ellerine gecince vizeyi size faksliyorlar yani bilemiyorum havaalaninda alamiyorum diye dert etmeye deger mi.Bu arada Solomon adalarina ve Papua Yeni gineye vizesiz girisin neden kaldirildigini biliyor musunuz? Saygilarimla —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajdamania2 (talk • contribs) 17:39, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for you note on my talk page.
I know that there was talk about abolishing visa-on-arrival for citizens of Gulf countries. However the Turkish embassy site in London still lists Saudi Arabians among those that can get the visa on arrival (see [1]). Do you have any official site which shows that this facility has been abolished for Saudi passport holders ?
I also check timatic [2] and it lists the planned date for the abolition of the facility as November 1, 2009. I.e. it most likely hasn't taken effect yet. When and if it does, I will change the page to reflect this. Passportguy (talk) 16:52, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Hello. Thanks for your message.
Unfortunately, I have no such an official site which approves abolishing of those 'on arrival' visas for Gulf countries.
I've seen that only on timatic website. It writes same thing (as November 1, 2009) for Saudi, UAE, Bahrain, Qatar, Kuwait.
I will let you know if / when i will have an official alert and more details on that subject.
By the way,
You wrote that, you know that there was talk about abolishing V.O.A for citizens of Gulf countries. From where did you hear that? Does the EU wants Turkey to do so?
Thanks.
With my best regards..
--Ozguroot (talk) 00:52, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File source problem with File:Yenibiyometrikpasaportlar.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Yenibiyometrikpasaportlar.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
Hello Ozguroot, I wanted to change the picture of countries which have biometric passports, but I couldn't, so if you can I would really appreciate it. Since 15 October Bosnia and Herzegovina started issuing biometric passports, if you could mark it on a map, it would be cool. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by FaceOffic (talk • contribs) 17:43, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
NowCommons: File:Map of countries with biometric passports 2.svg
Thanks for uploading File:Yenibiyometrikpasaportlar.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude ► 08:18, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Could you explain your reversions - at least quantify them on the discussion page as I've asked. The removal wasn't unneccesary, because as it currently stands the reinstated sentence is unclear. Which "original" Playstation does the sentence refer to? A specific model (such as the SCPH-1000), a country release, (US/EURO/JP?) or merely the original grey box Playstation? As stated, my 1002 - the original European release - has the grey slabbed music background, ergo the sentence is inaccurate in at least one logical interpretation. a_man_alone (talk) 22:47, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello.
I think there's been a misunderstanding, or I haven't been clear enough.
Original PlayStation = SCPH-1000 = JP
Following notification at CENT and subsequent discussion at Talk:Passport, a clear consensus has emerged for the removal of these sections from the articles concerned. Please do not unilaterally re-apply them Thank you. RashersTierney (talk) 22:37, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You are just wasting your time, because A LOT OF people will undo them. And again because; People like those details. People want those details when they check "X Passport". People look for those details. They're useful information for their articles. What would you put there, otherwise? List of famous pop singers?! Or maybe people visit their passports articles to see some photos and the colour of the passports? Not funny.
--Ozguroot (talk) 22:56, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on others' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. See: [3][4]. —what a crazy random happenstance03:57, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
There is nothing wrong. I do respect Wikipedia's principles that's why i reported your "decide" to them so they'll check it out. They may think opposite, right? They are moderators & editor of the article in subject. I wanted to let them know about that "craziness".
--Ozguroot (talk) 10:39, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:13, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your comments. Please note that on Wikipedia, consensus is determined by discussion, not voting, and it is the quality of arguments that counts, not the number of people supporting a position. Consider reading about the deletion policy for a brief overview for the deletion process, and how we decide what to keep and what to delete. We hope you decide to stay and contribute even more. Thank you! Mass reverting of consensus edits is unlikely to result in a new consensus and may be considered disruptive. Please re-consider your behavior on passport-related articles.RashersTierney (talk) 17:31, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"Resume discussion?" I must say the same for you. The problem is you don't care about the discussion. YOU are deleting the sections, not me. --Ozguroot (talk) 02:06, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Isn't banning the only one-side (me) already a "picking a side"? I am sorry but i will resume all of them. If that won't be me, it will just be someone else. This user is almost EMPTYING the "Passport" articles. The editors of those articles (including me) do NOT agree with him, and neither with that removal. Please read: Talk:Passport Regards. --Ozguroot (talk) 01:56, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"I did not block Happenstance for edit warring as he did not try to revert Ozguroot." Are you sure? Could you check it again please? Just see the history pages.--Ozguroot (talk) 02:00, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ozguroot, I know we are on opposite sides of this content dispute but threatening to resume your revert warring is almost guaranteed to get your block extended. Please desist. After you resume editing, you are welcome to try to make your case at [[Talk:Passport}} by reasoned debate but this mass reverting has to stop. Its very disruptive. RashersTierney (talk) 02:05, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I did not try to revert your latest wave of edit warring, no. Instead I pleaded that you stop reverting, twice, which you ignored. I wouldn't revert more than twice, it's never productive, and it establishes that there is a conflict which needs to be solved with words, not button mashing. You pride yourself on ignorance of policy - perhaps this hour long block may give you some time to read it. —what a crazy random happenstance02:07, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"Needs to be solved with words?" Yes, that was the problem. The problem is "words" don't make you stop deleting the sections. Seriously, do you read the comments on Talk:Passport? (No, not just yours but the others.) --Ozguroot (talk) 02:17, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, this mass deleting really has to stop. An another editor says: So far 9 editors have spoken up against this removal. There is no consensus for your point of view. --Ozguroot (talk) 02:11, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have responded to his concerns on Talk:Passport, directing him to the poll which has been conducted and which has resulted in overall support for the proposal. I will not discuss this here, when you're ready to participate in mature discussion rather than edit warring you can rejoin the debate. —what a crazy random happenstance02:14, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ozguroot edited in line with reestablished consensus while the other user that complained Happenstance as well as RashersTierney were equally abusive and reverted him then he reverted them etc. I find it absurd to block him for these edits, especially mentioning how they were mass edits; did you check edit history of those articles? Apparently not because you would see mass removal preceding his edits. User RashersTierney has run what I believe to be a canvassed straw poll to establish consensus but soon after the "consensus" was noted by regular editors it became apparent there was no consensus to remove large amount of info from 200 articles. The "consensus" was thus gone the very next day. Ozguroot might be angrier then the rest because unlike us he didn't just loose months of work but also a lot of money he gave to receive prompt updates on the subject so that he could update Wikipedia. Finally I will quote one user from the talk page, I see no signs of consensus from the dozens of diligent editors who maintained those pages and were blindsided by their removal without so much as a notice on the corresponding talk pages of the articles affected.--Avala (talk) 11:23, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Next time you're in the passport pages (esp. Mongolian passport, where I started) please note I created a new template {{timatic}} which looks to simplify and reduce the number of errors associated with generating links to authoritative Timatic passport control data. I'm hoping this template can be worked on further to reliably generate links which are self-evidently correct, compact to type, and maintainable. Edward Vielmetti (talk) 08:21, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your help in editing and updating Visa requirements for Croatian citizens. Best regards. Tomi566 (talk) 14:35, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
Can you update the Serbian passport? Please (Nicaragua-visa on arrival...) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.87.196.12 (talk) 20:15, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on File:Yakup-kadri-karaosmanoglu.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
"non-commercial use", cc tag a lie
You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:File:Yakup-kadri-karaosmanoglu.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
Thanks for letting me know. I hope we will get the visa-free section back, after admins and other contributers realize how useless is to have it on separate article. Rave92(talk)22:22, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Hulya Avsar.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion,
a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hulya Avsar.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
Kusura bakmayın, geçen haftalardaki aşırı yoğunluğum sebebiyle bu süreçte size destek veremedim. Ama anladığım kadarıyla oldukça iyi bir ara formül bulunarak sorun çözülmüş.
Makaleyi usanmaksızın güncelleme konusundaki ısrarınız taktire şayan. Wikipedia camiası size ne kadar teşekkür etse az. Başlangıçta biraz da kendim için hazırladığım bu liste, önce Kaygtr'nin yaptığı görselleştirme, ardından da sizin güncellemelerinizle bambaşka bir hale bürünerek bu alandaki en güncel ve güvenilir kaynak haline geldi. Öyle ki sayenizde sayısız kişiye bu listeyi referans olarak gösterdim, göstermeye de devam ediyorum.
Yılmadan devam etmenizi diliyorum. Vakit buldukça ve elimden geldikçe size yardım etmeye çalışacağım.
Hi, I think that you have to select countires which is visa-free and on arrivial on the map, beacuse it may seems that there is no country which is visa-free for Turkey 77.76.22.174 (talk) 22:53, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Niçin 'Visa requirements for X citizens' makalelerindeki standard biçimli haritaları kendi keyfinize göre düzenlenmiş haritalar ile değiştirmekte ısrar ediyorsunuz? --Ozguroot (talk) 13:57, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for praising my contributions to English Wikipedia! Recently I have been blocked from Russian Wikipedia for alleged "distructive behaiviour" (the issue was the differency of views regarding the antisemitism of last Russian emperors) and now I fight for deblocking (a sympathetic Russian administrator has agreed to act on my behalf). I used to be involved mostly with Russian Wikipedia but now I edit English Wikipedia more.
Among other things, I am interested in Turkish issues, I have been to Turkey three times (Antalia and Istanbul) and have read an interesting book "Sons of Conquerors" about Turks and other Turkish peoples.
By the way, I have noted that you admire Grigori Perelman, a Russian mathematician. I am actualy his relative (second cousin). However, we do not have much contact (I have met him personally only once, before he became so famouse).
Olegwiki (talk) 06:50, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello again, Olegwiki. Wow, how nice! He's a GREAT person! Please send my best regards for him. Actually, you've a lot of people to be proud of. Grigori Perelman, Fyodor Mikhaylovich Dostoyevsky, Leo Tolstoy are just very few of them. I've almost a full set of Dostoyevsky's and Tolstoy's books. They're very precious writers, not only for Russian literature, but for the World literature as well! I like Russian literature, history, language and people. Too many Turco-Russian families here in Turkey. Glad to see they're happy. Russian people are usually very educated and smart. However, sadly, the youth there seem becoming nazists, nowadays. A nazist Russian... Sounds like a comedy. Don't they even read their own history? Sad.. :-( Anyway, my best wishes for Russian nation and people. --Ozguroot (talk) 22:53, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your works on Turkish passport. I really appriciate your works. I couldnt find a Turkish Cypriot passport photo on internet. Can you help me to find a photo? Maverick16 (talk) 16:36, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merhaba Ozguroot. Visa requirements for Turkish citizens maddesinde Mısır devletinin Türk vtandaşlarından vze isteği yazılı. Bu doğru fakat 15 dolar karşılığı sınır kapısından vize alınabiliyor. 2009 senesinden beri bu böyledir. İstersen Mısır knsolololuğunu arayıpsorabilirsin. Tabloyu tekrar düzeltebilirmisin ve ayrıca vze haritasında Mısır'ı gri renkten buz mavisi rengine dönüştürebilme imkanın varmı? Emresunay (talk) 06:15, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merhaba. Mısır, Türk vatandaşlarına sınırda vize vermemektedir. Turistik gruplar halinde gidilirse veya 45 yaş üzeri kişilere verilmektedir. Tüm bunlar da sıradan bir VOA (Sınırda vize) uygulaması değil, bir istisnadır. Buradaki vize uygulamaları, herkese hitap etmelidir. Herkes için geçerli olan uygulamalar eklenmektedir. Şurada Mısır ile ilgili öyle bir ibare yoktur [5] - Esenlikler. --Ozguroot (talk) 11:12, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
There's absolutely no reason to keep russia still in green in this map. It might very well misguide people. And also visa free and visa on arrival countries should be seperated. Maps are alot more helpful than lists because most people dont bother go down and check out lists below. You cant put notes into those lists either even though an agrement is signed its not in force until both governments ratify it in their parliements. If youre so keen on letting people know about an upcoming visa free situation you can put those countries in a different colour while youre changing the map. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ardagul87 (talk • contribs) 08:16, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Maps are much helpful than detailed lists? Wait, how many people use ONLY THE MAP and discover the visa regime of Bahrain, St. Lucia, Papua New Guinea for Turkish citizens by a single eye-hit to the map and don't bother going down to look to the list? I can't put notes into those lists? Who said so? Where's this rule? Those notes even offer some additional (and important) details to the visitors if you care about not-misguiding the people. Yes, I agree on that - Russia and Yemen will be removed from the map soon. --Ozguroot (talk) 16:02, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Google search yields few results other than mirror sites. The only other link to him is part of an unsourced reference on another wikipedia page, Civita. He is not even on the Civita page. Feel free to WP:AFD this if you disagree.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Thanks for uploading File:Diyarbakir 1.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
Hi there,
Can you update the map? + Ukraine (visa free), + Algeria (diplomatic and official passports) and + Uruguay (diplomatic and official passports)
Ukrainian and Serbian officials have signed an agreement on a visa-free regime for short-term travel between two countries on Tuesday. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.223.60.49 (talk) 11:10, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Vikipedide doğruluk ve objektif politikalarını savunan tüm Türk Vikipedistlere.
Kars sayfasında MarshallBagramyan adlı bir kullanıcı Kars maddesini gasp edip, Ermenice versiyonundaki adını bırakıp diğer dillerdeki versiyonlarını hep siliyor. Tartışma sayfasında gerekçesi de objektif değil çünkü Kars'ın diğer etnisitelerini ve tarihlerini kasten göz ardı eden bir milliyetçi anlayışı var. Savunması da bu yönde.
Ve bu tartışma sayfasında senelerdir çözülmüş değil çünkü öyle bir niyet yok, ve denetimciler tarafından göz yumuluyor.
Hangi duyarlı Vikipedist artık bunu ciddiye alıp, tek taraflı "değişiklikleri" denetleyip dur diyecek?
Çünkü adeta lobi faaliyetlerin Vikipedideki yansıması bu ve hiç kimse bir göz atıp dur demiyor, maalesef Türk Vikipedistler de dahil. "Tartışma sayfasında bunu tartışın" önerisi (çünkü ihmal ediliyor ve çözüme yönelik bir çaba yok) yerine bir bu maddeyi ve bunun gibi diğer maddeleri denetleyip ve bunun gibi kullanıcıların değişiklikerine oldu bitti demeyip, yapılan böyle tek taraflı "değişiklikleri" geri alın. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.224.30.11 (talk) 23:57, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Selam burda bir SAM tartışması var. Kaynakların çoğu taraflı ve Ağrı ayaklanmalarını anlatıyor. Dolayısıyla kaynak varmış gibi görünüyor ancak içerisinde anlatılan olaylar kaynaklarda Ağrı isyanlarını anlatıyor. Ayrıca maddede İnönü'nün resminin olması ile birlikte düşünürsek madde zorlamayla yapılmış. Aynı tartışma türkçe vikipedide var. Belki ilgilenmek istersin. Kolay gelsin.--Nihan (talk) 09:56, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Türk Vatandaşlarının tabi olduğu vize uygulamaları
Merhaba Ozguroot. Türk Vatandaşlarının tabi olduğu vize uygulamaları maddesindeki vize rejimi haritasını güncellemişsin. Ellerine sağlık fakat haritada bazı yanlışlıklar var. Moritanya ve Mali VOA (Sınırda vize) olarak gösteriliyor fakat böyle bir uygulamanın olduğuna dair bir kaynak yok. Hatta dışişlerinin sitesindede halen bu ülkelerin umumi pasaport sahiplerinden vize istediği belirtilmektedir. Bunların tekrar gri renkte olması gerekir.
Ayrıca Meksika gibi Avustralya ve Fildişi Sahilleri'ne seyahatlerde de seyahat öncesi internetten vize almak mümkün. Meksika gibi bu ülkelerinde renginin değiştirilmesi lazım fakat Meksika gibi açık mavi renkte değil başka bir renkte gösterilir. Çünkü açık mavi biliyorsun ki varışta verilen vize olarak gösteriliyor. Oysaki bu internetten online alınan vizedir. Bu üç ülkenin renklerini internet vizesine göre ayarlayabilirmisin?
Ayrıca Kuveyt'inde açık mavi olması gerekir. Onada sınırda vize alınabiliyor. Bir de Botsvana'ya da vize geçen sene kalkmıştır. Onada şuradan bakabilirsin. Haritada koyu mavi renk olması gerekiyor. Bunları güncelleyebilirmisin? İyi çalışmalar dilerim Emresunay (talk) 04:05, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:Biyometrikp2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ★ BigrTex00:17, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Hello, Ozguroot. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.
wikimedia.org.
Hello. It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on others' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. See: [3] [4]. —what a crazy random happenstance 03:57, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:13, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
